Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 14, 2024, 12:13:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
BRITISH COLUMBIA CLASSIC MOTORCYCLE CLUB
18633 Posts in 384 Topics by 476 Members
Latest Member: tkoven
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+ 
|-+  BC Club forum boards
| |-+  General Chat and Ideas
| | |-+  Rebuild title... does it really matter on an older bike?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Rebuild title... does it really matter on an older bike?  (Read 270 times)
kaw74
BCCMC Star (5K)
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 7204



« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2024, 04:51:49 PM »

That's a new one for me.  I've never seen a bike registration with Rebuild on it.  Didn't know there was any such thing.
Cody bought his first bike with a rebuilt status a few years ago.
Logged
Bucko
1000 Class
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2497



« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2024, 05:47:46 PM »

If I was looking for a daily rider, I wouldn't hesitate to buy a bike with a rebuilt title (I have one now) as long as the damage was only cosmetic (or otherwise repairable) and I planned on keeping it for a while, but as others have pointed out, I would expect a discount.
Logged
rz5mark
1000 Class
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1816


« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2024, 05:25:15 AM »

So easy to write off an older bike. Parts are expensive as is labour. Nothing mechanical could be wrong but a tank and bodywork puts it over a dollar threshold. Had this conversation with Dave Graff at New Life Cycle many times.
Logged
Bucko
1000 Class
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2497



« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2024, 11:09:00 AM »

So easy to write off an older bike. Parts are expensive as is labour. Nothing mechanical could be wrong but a tank and bodywork puts it over a dollar threshold. Had this conversation with Dave Graff at New Life Cycle many times.

Just went through this.  Bike got knocked over while parked and was technically 'totalled' as the cost to repair or replace the mostly cosmetic parts, was way more than the bike was worth.  However, as there was nothing mechanically wrong with the bike, I came to an agreement with ICBC to keep the bike - untotaled- along with a cash settlement.
Logged
Galactica
1000 Class
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 4472



« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2024, 12:06:54 PM »

So easy to write off an older bike. Parts are expensive as is labour. Nothing mechanical could be wrong but a tank and bodywork puts it over a dollar threshold. Had this conversation with Dave Graff at New Life Cycle many times.

Just went through this.  Bike got knocked over while parked and was technically 'totalled' as the cost to repair or replace the mostly cosmetic parts, was way more than the bike was worth.  However, as there was nothing mechanically wrong with the bike, I came to an agreement with ICBC to keep the bike - untotaled- along with a cash settlement.

I did the same when I crashed my ‘77 KZ1000.  Dented the tank, mirror, signal, exhaust.  ICBC cut a check a few hundred under the write off threshold, and I repaired all that cosmetic stuff.  The adjuster was quite sympathetic in helping same a classic bike from the scrap/auction sites.
Logged

Past rides:
75 Honda CB750K5
80 Suzuki TS250
 ? Yamaha Maxim 550
73 Z1 900
76 Kz900 A1
77 Kz1000 A1
78 Kz1000 B2 Ltd
79 Kz1000 B3 Ltd
80 Kz1000 C
99 Triumph Tiger 900
84 Honda VF750 Interceptor
77 Honda CB750


Current ride:
2019 Yamaha Tracer900

Current project:
1975 Honda CB750K5
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!